Today at Law
AN INTRODUCTION TO THE TRIBAL JUSTICE SYSTEM OF THE SOVEREIGN NATION OF THE TEJAS INDIANS, HASINAI CONFEDERACY
Sections to be found:
- Basics of law
- International and Treaty
- FAQs
Welcome to the International and Treaty section of the Tejas Indians. Here you will find
many interesting sightings and treaties as applicable to the Tejas and other Tribal
Nations within Indian country. You will find important definitions and
resources regarding the relationship with Federal and State Governments and how certain aspects
of Tribal Government works in the relationship to such Governments. You will also find
important papers written by Professors with a PhD in History and a JD in Law thus as
such which will help the lay person to outline and to define such as the treaties themselves.
Please keep in mind the United States Supreme Court (USSC) rulings and the International World
Court rulings support Treaties and are enforceable as Supreme law. The USSC has ruled that a
treaty with a Tribal Nation is understood by those which have signed such
at the time and as such any error, implication or latitude given or implied shall be ruled
upon in the favor of the Tribal Nation.
Each country or Nation listed below has signed a treaty with the Tejas. Copies are available upon request.
- Spain
- Mexico
- 1836 Republic of Texas - that of government of now the State of Texas and its present government - signed 1844 at Birds Fort
- United States
- Russia
- England / UK / Brittain
- Canada (New France)
- France
- Indonesia
- Philippines
- Confederate States of America
Inter-Tribal Agreements / Intergovernmental agreements (between agencies and departments)
- Memorandums of agreement
- Memorandums of understanding
- Letters of mutual aid
- Letters of Marque
- Commissions
- Writs of mandamus
- Federal Court orders
- Executive orders of the President of the United States
To request memorandums and agreements as well as letters of mutual aid and such other instruments of agreements
from the Tribal Nation you will need to contact us.
A constitution of treaties consists of ceremony and trading of or gifting of gifts of such occasion and
exchanging of communications of words which may or may not be written. In cases with Tribal Nations, a
ceremony and gifting of gifts is as such an words were spoken, and in some cases the letting of blood. The
oldest standing treaty between tribal nations to date is that between the Tejas and the Seminole Nation of
which in 300 each Tribal Nation agreed to be at peace with one another and gifts were exchanged. Tobacco
was smoked and blood was let. The words of each chief were spoken and have been honored to date. At times
where blood was let this was done by each chief as a reminder of the iron of words spoken. These symbols
carried the scar of the words spoken on their own body, as a testimony of the weight of these words.
US Supreme Court Rulings Concerning Indians:
The Constitution of the United States
click here
The Constitution of the State of Texas
click here
The Constitution of the State of Louisiana
click here
Understanding the Concept of Law
A brief history and introduction to Tribal and Sovereign Law
Law is the word of rule and the understanding of such rule, written or other wise conveyed as words given to
governing a society of its ways - thus dictation of society's ways and thus its traditions, customs and rules
as to how to handle transgressions and how societies settle disputes.
History shows the basics rule of law comes down to a basic show and thus a use of and force of a contest of
arms for transgressions. Thus the law of survival it is primitive and yet unwritten but very well
understood. Thus of such contest in life is the basic contest of survival of life and limb, which are
governed by these basic rules as set down.
Society has evolved to incorporate degrees of such use of force to direct, and dictate such actions, and
reactions to such measures of transgressions, thus to take away freedoms of a person which steals for a time
is a punishment of such transgression. To take life and limb from that person for such transgression is
another concept of the same measure only to different and varying degrees.
It is the basic understanding to right such wrong by that concept of an eye for an eye and a tooth for a
tooth. A need for a understanding of justice equally an unilaterally dispensed for all persons in society
for the common good of the whole has been developed.
This concept is known as law. to do so evenly and equally regardless of statute or stature, with out
predetermination of such position of where one stands in society is a concept known as Justice. With out
getting into such technical difficulty as to explain law and such complexes of the history of law and its
concept, we will use a simple approach and thus In the United States of America there are (4) general
systems of law of which three are European thought based in concept.
These systems today utilize a court and judges for rulings to settle such disputes civilly, of such by
contest of wit, wisdom and knowledge and thus no longer by contest of arms. In medieval times where there
was someone to champion a cause - a physical contest of arms between such champions was judged, and ended
the conflict. Some say the sport of jousting developed over such contest- the thought was the one whom
fougnt the bravest and won was the one that was just and right and developed the art of a dual between
nobles to settle personal matters as not to cause a major war between estates.
The fourth concept is a understood as universal law that of the Sovereign and as such are the basic laws of
most civilizations.
These are concepts of law, and in each society you will find the basics of these concepts:
- The common law
- The law of Nobles
- The Kings' law
- Sovereign law / law of Sovereigns
The most basic laws shall be found in earliest of times which come from the early Middle East, which
expanded to that of European culture. The basic laws of instinct that of survival is apparent in all
creatures- the thing that distinguishes man from animal is the thought of, he not only having spirit also
possesses a living mortal soul- this is a basic though of native- sovereign law - thus having both spirit and
a mortal soul man has duty to morally live upstanding before his Creator which gives him the breath of life
and living waters, to drink.
In the earliest of times, the laws you may find are as such the Ten Commandments. Prior to that was that of
the
concept of written law was given by the Babylonian kings in the early Euro civilization periods
of the Caesars' of Rome, the Pharaohs of Egypt and the Art of Modern thought of the Greeks. Yet the laws of
those Kings and Caesars are a development of European culture, and such standard which influences law even
today. If you were to follow the Ten Commandments as implied, you would probably not find yourself in
trouble with the law or in trouble with others. Thus the laws given are common for the good of society, and
thus some refer to them as common rule of law. However, they were received, thus not to question such as
to the origin of such laws, they have been as such to be followed thus the common good of man is protected.
Each Society contains such basics of these ten ideas and rule of law.
These laws and concepts are utilized to keep the general peace of the land. Thus lesson conflict to a
minimum, orchestrating such limited use of force of arms against the perpetrator and not the whole society
or family of which that person belongs to.
The most common is that of common law which that of Spanish and English origin is what most of the nation is
familiar with. Common law is such as law which was understood and implied law of the land of which the very
common man was subject to. And thus rule was in a lower court of the land, sometimes called a tinkers court,
for the rule did not apply to the nobles.
The common man's rule of law this common code was that of subject duty to one another, thus stealing was
stealing any where you would go, such punishment of such was any thing from loss of hands to death. Depending
on the culture and that of the rule of law extended to the common man, thus where the nobles were concerned
and thus money was more involved. The Nobles had their own set of rule of law which was applicable only to
them and thus their vassals had the common law as given by such noble.
There is as such another forum of laws which set a standard to rule that of the European French, called
Napoleonic or Imperial law, which was a set of laws of standard of justice which dictated how such common
laws were enforced, through out vassal kingdoms. This is now a Federalist concept of government.
In Texas for the most part, for European Settlers (whites and those which migrated with such Euro
descendants) all laws are that of common law. Even today, each marriage, unless specified by a special
certificate is that of a common law marriage. If a marriage is noted of different certificate, and
registered as such thus the rule of marriage and its dissolution is treated different with protections given
to both parties, and their families.
The Common law is as such now uniformed code applicable to all, and as such the most familiar of common law
is that of keeping the peace of the land.
The next is that of Noble law of which origins are yet again European based. Spanish and English nobility
system where there were nobles which were subject to a king of such the nobles had vassals which were their
subject of rule of law, The Nobel law kept to a code of what was to be called chivalry developed by the
French standard - and as such dictated as to ones manner and presence; thus it dictated as to how one noble
was to treat with another, and thus how each estate of each noble was directed and as such it was to be
settled at times by also rule or force of arms if needed. at times such contest delivered the sport of
jousting.
Thus the vassals were pressed into such militia to enforce the noble rule and thus settle conflict between
nobles at times. These nobles utilized attorneys or other hired persons with the expertise in the use of
weapons and tactics. In the times of court such attorneys were placed in contest with one another in mortal
battle to champion a cause of wrong doing; thus the duel to settle such disputes between nobles was
developed. Imagine if today that the lawyers had to don armor and physically fight out the battles of those that they champion their cause-
The third type of law was that of Kings law, or known as Colonial law of which the king ruled his colonies
of nobles. His or her lesser vassals through Sovereign law this was also recognized as the rule of law of
the land of the kingdom of such as the King the Sovereign Noble ruled from his/ her court as Sovereign in
persona. Thus His or Her word and will was law of the land.
This brings us to Sovereign law of which Tribal Nations are to be understood from a European Standard: as
such a Chief was king and as such noble and thus his rule was law. Thus the customs of the Chief were, and
are interpreted as law, under the chieftain and council systems. Added to this was a new concept for the
Europeans, a Council rule ( committee) both combined set the stage as to balance each other giving the
community justice equally.
Sovereign law has a three tiered system - of such we are familiar with and utilize today - local, state and
federal or national - for the greater good of society or group. Thus interoperated as; municipal/county or
local or home rule - which is subject to State rule of law - district court - thus a vassal of the Federal
system of law, thus the state is dependant and a subject to Federal code which is Noble law - and as such
Sovereign with in the world community. Each nation is looked upon as Sovereign, its leader however appointed
the Sovereign or king of such Nation- is that of the head of state.
The system of justice in the US is based upon a system which has three common levels - and one
Sovereign level. These are Local, State and Federal. The Sovereign forum of law is like the Tribal
justice System and is built upon and as such an older forum and unique to each Tribal Nation. Each Tribal
Nation is its own entity. Each Tribal Nation is as its own Sovereign Country or Sovereign Nation State with
in its own rights, and has its own laws and customs. Through these Treaty laws, or agreements which were
made with the Colonial Federalist the Federalist are to support and assist such Tribal nations, and their
protectorates in their enforcement of such law as rule thus the Tribal Nation is only subject to their own
law and the basic common laws of health and keeping the peace.
The United States Supreme Court has only limited jurisdiction as to Indian law, and can not rule on Tribal
codes which are only subject to Sovereign law of that Tribal Nation. However, the Tribal Codes of law may
not violate such civil liberties as given as to a United States citizen. Thus the Constitution of the United
States and the Bill of Rights are applicable to all through out Indian Country.
Tribal nations and its laws are not subject to or inferior to that of home rule, and that to state law.
However to note such common rule of law of: keeping the peace, and public health may be concurrent in such
jurisdictions where the two would meet thus a Tribal Nation does has jurisdiction over a State and home
rule Courts as well as limited federal authority to over turn certain rulings of State Judges if such
involves the Tribal Nation in that manner.
This jurisdiction is known as Comity of court - of such of by authority of Original jurisdiction for the
Tribal Nation it is its own, thus a Tribal Nation is a Sovereign State or Nation to its self thus as of such
no other court in the land may overturn a Tribal courts decision, or have such over Tribal Matters unless
specifically acted upon by a full measure of congress. This would call for certain measures to be taken by
Congress inclusive of, but not limited to, as such Congress will have to meet as a full blown court with all
of its members present and come with a unanimous desision to over turn such Tribal Supreme Courts rulings.
The last time congress met as a court like this was in 1776 - and the impeachment hearings of a president.
Thus the power of a tribal nation and its courts have comity of court and original jurisdiction over
certain matters of the states for they were there before the states and carry weight with in the
international community as Sovereigns.
In the Texas Constitution declares such as the State may not detract from or lesson or any court in the
land already in existence. Nor does the state have the power to dissolve such courts.
Common questions:
Question: Can I or any person be charged by a Tribal Nation for a crime?
A: Yes - In cases where laws have been broken Indian Country is no different, yet a lot tougher than one may
be able to understand- certain crimes are considered more heinnas with Indian Country, thus the codes and
punishment are according to such custom.
Question: Does a Tribal Nation have jurisdiction outside of their reservation?
A: Yes - In some cases some tribal nations (actually 16) were never placed on a reservation of such
one is a protectorate of the United States thus fully sovereign in its own Right to act and enforce such
laws and codes. In one case where a tribe has multiple treaties with multiple federal states (like Mexico,
France, Spain, the United States, England and Canada) such jurisdictions can be complicated. As such the
treaty governs such jurisdiction of how each sovereign will work with another in support of such laws. A
suggestion is not to temp such fate and stay a law abiding citizen. Thus the Tribal nation has jurisdictions
within such other nations and as such you will not need to be concerned with such if you stay within the
law, and do no harm to others.
Question: Can I be placed in prison or jail by a Tribal Nation?
A: Yes - In most cases there is a treaty which governs such incarcerations, as to whom will hold the prisoner
and who will carry out such execution of sentences. In most cases prior to 1980 the Colonial Federal
Government of the US respectfully took charge of prisoners within Indian Country and executed Tribal Code
and judgments against those which became the convicted and thus incarcerated under tribal code. This was to
balance such powers out as to insure fare and mutual aid and just treatment of prisoners. In some cases,
Tribal Nations have their own prison systems and jails. In other cases the chief judge may contact the
military police for assistance and thus a person may be held in a naval brig or military correctional
compound until bail and trial is set by the tribal judge. In some extreme cases, Tribal Nations do have a
death penalty. Some tribal nations use other means than lethal injection, gas or electrocution. Suggestion:
don't go there.
Question: How could I be affected by Tribal laws?
A: Matters of Tribal jurisdiction are associated with crimes against citizens, and
members of a tribal nation. In the breaking the peace of a treaty of which a person will face
not only the tribal law, but the Federal Government. And in some states, it is a
triple threat you should not tempt. The federal minimum penalty for such violation is that of two years
imprisonment at the pleasure of the chiefs at hard labor in a military prison. The fines and possible loss
of land and homestead, possible loss of US citizenship, and or in such serous cases that of deportation of
the offender and his/her family. Depending on Tribal Codes, in the most severe of cases, a tribal court
does have the power to strip a person of their US Citizenship for such serious violations of Treaties and
choose to deport a person to other locations of where only the United States has agreed jurisdiction like in
New Jersey, of which the United States has recognized exclusive Jurisdiction on the Island of Manhattan and
other insulars of which they have treaties with for such as in the case of Manhattan it is/ was the only
property recognized by the collective Tribal Nations as legally purchased by the United States - as such
this is an extreme example- and not probable, but again do not tempt or be put in a place where you may
have to face such matters- or as such in one case in 1794 where a French Trapper and fur trader and his
family were deported back to France. He was beheaded, and his family burned at the stake by the King of
France for starting an inter-tribal conflict between the bands of Bidias and Deadose of the Tejas-Atakapa
Confederacy (Hasinai wars).
Also note, Tribal Nations and their courts have such jurisdiction in civil matters including but not limited
to, regulation of utilities, roadways, easements -rights of way imminent domain, Sovereign Rights head
rights- mineral and water rights, that of probate and family matters, land disputes, Indian children,
marriages and business contracts dealing with the tribal Government and its agencies and businesses.
Note when matters come to land, a tribal nation has never lost a case involving land or land disputes and
as thus the Tribal Nation may utilize such powers as emanate domain of which there is no recourse, and have
such to do so over a states jurisdiction thus the State may not interfere with such matters dealing with a
Tribal nation.
The Tribal court of Tejas is the only known Tribal Nation and Tribal Court to have these Nations in
its court system for judgments outstanding against them: Spain, Rome (Vatican See), France, Mexico, The
United States in 1806- the ROT 1839- and England- 1814 of such there are outstanding matters of state which
need to be finished between such nations.
Question: Can I sue a Tribal Nation?
A: No - A tribal nation its council and chief is immune to civil suit, called Sovereign Immunity which all
Sovereigns in the World Community Share. Each nation has its own limits set by its structure. How ever as
such congress has dictated that such Tribal Nations are Immune from suit and may exercise such. The courtesy
is extended to the chief and council, yet only the limitations are as such extended only to divorce and
child support of which all persons are personally responsible for their families. In some cases they are
immune from certain criminal suits but that is very limited this is for diplomatic purposes. As such are
subject to their tribal code and federal enforcement of such code.
Question: Does a chief, or a member of a Tribal Council, or a Tribal Judge have diplomatic immunity?
A: In most cases yes. A Chief in fact is a head of State. like a President or that of an executive head of
state.
Question: Can I receive a ticket from a Tribal Police officer, Marshal or a Constable?
A: Yes - Keep in mind that a peace officer is just that no matter where their court that they report to is.
If a Court of the land has commissioned an officer you may receive a citation or a ticket for civil and
criminal violations of Tribal, State and federal codes. This is including that of the public safety and
health codes, a tribal officer or as such an officer dually sworn officer of the law and as such is sworn
in by a judge and has authority given to them by the Tribal Court which has authority from the Constitution
of the Tribal Nation supported by the United States and its Constitution and the articles of Congress, as
well as support from the Department of Justice and it is as such by order of a Tribal judge that The officer
of the court is commissioned and that they may issue such citations for offenses against such code. In some
cases, the Tribal official may utilize such digression and leave such as citations of that to the State and
local home rule law enforcement officers but, as such general policy has changed over the years thus Tribal
law enforcement is stepping up to its place and becoming more active in such enforcement. Thus it would be
wise to pay attention to such tickets issued - tribal warrants from a judge are just as nasty and affective
from an Indian Nation if not worse- for you may also have to face a federal judge in contempt charge as to
why you did not appear the tribal judge. This is not a good thing to face.
"To date with in our civilization today these wars which we now fight will be fought in the court rooms of
tomorrow, Thus laws are utilized liken to that of arrows shot in war to control such evilness and thus laws
and courts will battle crimes committed against civilized peoples, Justice and laws will be used as the
lance and horse tools to battle such crimes committed known and unknown, ignorance of the law is no excuse
to commit a crime or that of civil disobedience" "it is the true heart of the law one needs to come to know,
and understand then and only then peace may be achieved"
John Hopping-Crow
Justice of the Peace, Tejas Indians - 1899

|